By Jason Charles on 6/28/2017 (7 years 178 days ago) Health
Hospital births have become the norm in this country. This is because Big Pharma has worked exceedingly hard for over 100 years to effectively hijack the entire birth cycle and care of mothers and babies. This has been going on for so long, most woman you talk to would never consider having a natural birth with a midwife in the comfort of their own home. They literally have come to fear the natural birth process. They have come to prefer, the stressful, sterile, drug fueled, cesarean hungry environments of the hospitals, thinking it is the only way to mitigate emergent situations that might arise from giving birth naturally. Nothing could be further from the truth. The statistics show that natural birth's are safer by far. There was a massive study conducted between 2004 - 2010 that examined 17,000 midwife-led care and births. Here is a write up on some of the findings of this study,
"In today’s peer-reviewed Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health (JMWH), a landmark study** confirms that among low-risk women, planned home births result in low rates of interventions without an increase in adverse outcomes for mothers and babies.
This study, which examines nearly 17,000 courses of midwife-led care, is the largest analysis of planned home birth in the U.S. ever published.
The results of this study, and those of its companion article about the development of the MANA Stats registry, confirm the safety and overwhelmingly positive health benefits for low-risk mothers and babies who choose to birth at home with a midwife. At every step of the way, midwives are providing excellent care. This study enables families, providers and policymakers to have a transparent look at the risks and benefits of planned home birth as well as the health benefits of normal physiologic birth.
Of particular note is a cesarean rate of 5.2%, a remarkably low rate when compared to the U.S. national average of 31% for full-term pregnancies. When we consider the well-known health consequences of a cesarean -- not to mention the exponentially higher costs -- this study brings a fresh reminder of the benefits of midwife-led care outside of our overburdened hospital system.
Home birth mothers had much lower rates of interventions in labor. While some interventions are necessary for the safety and health of the mother or baby, many are overused, are lacking scientific evidence of benefit, and even carry their own risks. Cautious and judicious use of intervention results in healthier outcomes and easier recovery, and this is an area in which midwives excel. Women who planned a home birth had fewer episiotomies, pitocin for labor augmentation, and epidurals.
Most importantly, their babies were born healthy and safe. Ninety-seven percent of babies were carried to full-term, they weighed an average of eight pounds at birth, and nearly 98% were being breastfed at the six-week postpartum visit with their midwife." (Mana.org)
It is obvious from this study that midwife-led home births reduce the need for intervention, c-sections, unnecessary drugs, they reduce tearing, promoted breastfeeding and more. Peoples fears they have about the natural birth process are demonstratively unfounded. What's more is the cost of hospital births are outrageous. An article in the NYT addressed the costs of hospital births, in the article it noted a few things, one, having a baby could cost up to $45,000+, and two, the mortality rate has skyrocketed showing expensive care is less effective.
"From 2004 to 2010, the prices that insurers paid for childbirth — one of the most universal medical encounters — rose 49 percent for vaginal births and 41 percent for Caesarean sections in the United States, with average out-of-pocket costs rising fourfold, according to a recent report by Truven that was commissioned by three health care groups. The average total price charged for pregnancy and newborn care was about $30,000 for a vaginal delivery and $50,000 for a C-section, with commercial insurers paying out an average of $18,329 and $27,866, the report found."
...
"Despite its lavish spending, the United States has one of the highest rates of both infant and maternal death among industrialized nations, although the fact that poor and uninsured women and those whose insurance does not cover childbirth have trouble getting or paying for prenatal care contributes to those figures." (NYT )
Like everything in this world it all comes down to greed. The use of hospital facilities, drugs, and surgical methods of delivery are a goldmine, and it is little wonder the rates of C-sections are now at 70% in some hospitals. They don't care about the patients, they only care about how many 0's end up on that final bill.
So at the end of the day we can say that there are much better and much cheaper options available when it comes to labor and delivery, but many are simply too fearful to consider a midwife-led birth. What I want people to realize is there is a lot more at stake here than just money and unnecessary surgery in the delivery room. There is a far more insidious agenda to disrupt the natural birth cycle, that agenda is the disruption of the family unit itself.
Here are Five Things that Hospital Births Destroy along with the wellbeing of mother and child.
The Disruption of the Mother/ Father Bond that Occurs with Natural Birth
A while back the Daily Mail published an article citing a prominent doctors warning against having husbands present in the delivery room. In this article he states,
"That there is little good to come for either sex from having a man at the birth of a child.
For her, his presence is a hindrance, and a significant factor in why labours are longer, more painful and more likely to result in intervention than ever.
As for the effect on a man - well, was I surprised to hear a friend of mine state that watching his wife giving birth had started a chain of events that led to the couple's divorce?" (Daily Mail)
In the article he goes onto lament the presence of fathers in the delivery room citing his experience as anecdotal evidence for his position. This may be true if the mother, father, and doctor are ignorant and scared of the natural birth process, which almost all are, but for a husband and wife that are totally prepared and ready for the experience the opposite occurs. The natural bonding that occurs between mother, father and child over the course of a midwife-led pregnancy, labor, and birth is simply miracoulous. For both the mother and father the experience of delivering their own child creates an emotional bond with one another that is unbreakable. The satisfaction of a mother and father catching their own baby, and overcoming all of the obstacles of labor prepares them for anything that life can throw at them. In fact more couples are opting for this knowing full well that it ultimately enhance the nature, trust and strength of their relationship.
There is an agenda in this country to disrupt the family unit. That is a fact. This starts in the delivery room when husband and wives are denied access to one another during labor and childbirth. By disallowing the father to participate in the birth process a fundamental layer of trust and emotional bonding is denied this couple, something that is critical to long-term success of a marriage and child rearing.
Please support Wake the Church through the purchase of our film Christ Alone
The Overuse of C-sections
In the beginning of this article I talked about the outrageous rates C-sections are being performed in the U.S. hospitals, concluding doctors do it for money and convenience. What isn't being taken into account is how these unnecessary surgeries are impacting the family and babies well after childbirth. Mainly mothers are being denied the chemical release that cause bonding to occur with their new baby. An article in the New Scientist discussing a study on C-sections and mother/child bonding reads,
"In the study published this week, half the women had Caesareans and half gave birth naturally.
Three to four weeks after they had given birth, the women had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans while they listened to recordings of their own baby crying, a different baby crying, or an artificial sound similar to a baby crying.
The scans revealed that when they heard their own baby crying, women who had given birth via Caesarean had lower levels of activity than mothers who had undergone natural births in parts of the brain linked with empathy, drive and motivation.
One possible explanation, say the researchers, is that women having Caesareans miss out on the hormonal “priming” for motherhood thought to happen when women deliver naturally through the vagina.
As the baby descends, oxytocin – sometimes called the “love hormone” – is released and is thought to prime the mother for behaviour that helps forge an instant bond with the baby, such as cuddling, kissing and feeding."(New Scientist)
The mother infant bond cannot be overemphasized, there are process at work during pregnancy and after childbirth that simply should not be disrupted. A vaginal birth triggers a flood of bonding chemicals and hormones in the mother that are critical towards the long-term emotional and physical well-being of mom and baby, and it is criminal that doctors are denying their patients this for financial reward. The impact on the family is far reaching.
What is more, the use of C-section at such an alarming rate is literally changing the genetic landscape of the human species. A study done on this showed,
"Research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America found that the rise in C-sections since the 1950s and 1960s has apparently prompted babies to have larger heads. But the birth canals of women are not adapting to this increase in head size, necessitating C-sections in more cases, the study suggests."(attn.com)
This means that woman are passing on genes that could result in the inability to have vaginal births generations from now. This plays right into the desire for custom, artificial wombs and the total hijacking and control of the reproduction of the human species. As woman become incapable of delivering babies vaginally technology will evolve where designer babies will be grown in a lab. This technology already exists, it is called the Artificial Womb and it has already been used to grow baby sheep. This Brave New World scenario is upon us, whether by accident or design it means we will essentially be neutered as a species once access to natural reproduction is removed. Without question this issue is central to the disruption of the family. The way C-sections place limits on how many children a woman can have is without a doubt a subtle population control method.
Pushing Dangerous Vaccination Schedules
I am not one to get pulled into straw-men arguments surrounding the vaccination controversy. Whether vaccines are efficacious or not is besides the point, the real point is, are the vaccines clean? Can we find any vaccines that do not contain adjunct toxins and materials? The answer is no, there simply is no such thing as a clean vaccine. Every vaccine is full of toxic ingredients that exceed the CDC recommended limits. Toxic mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, dyes, excitotoxins, live viruses, animal by-products, and even aborted human fetal tissue are pumped directly into the blood of newborn babies. In addition to these toxic poisons in the vaccines the vaccination schedule forced upon new mothers is outright criminal. Big Pharma will sacrifice your children's for profit every time. The rise in autoimmune, diseases, cancers, autism and even death in children has skyrocketed and perfectly correlates with the massive vaccine schedule.
A Historical Look at the Vaccine Schedule (Source)
Autism Rates in America
1975: 1 in 5,000
1985: 1 in 2,500
1995: 1 in 500
2000: 1 in 150
2004: 1 in 125
2006: 1 in 110
2008: 1 in 88
2010-2014: 1 in 68
Sources: cdc.gov, autismspeaks.org
1983 Schedule
DTP (2 mo)
OPV (2 mo)
DTP (4 mo)
OPV (4 mo)
DTP (6 mo)
MMR (15 mo)
DTP (18 mo)
OPV (18 mo)
DTP (4 yr)
OPV (4 yr)
Td (14 yr)
1994 Schedule
HepB (birth)
HepB (2 mo)
DTP (2 mo)
OPV (2 mo)
Hib (2 mo)
DTP (4 mo)
OPV (4 mo)
Hib (4 mo)
DTP(6 mo)
OPV (6 mo)
Hib (6 mo)
HepB (6 mo)
MMR (12 mo)
Hib (12 mo)
DTaP/DTP (15 mo)
DTaP/DTP (4 yr)
OPV (4 yr)
MMR (4 yr)
2015 Schedule
Influenza (pregnancy)
DTaP (pregnancy)
HepB (birth)
HepB (2 mo)
Rotavirus (2 mo)
DTaP (2 mo)
Hib (2 mo)
PCV (2 mo)
IPV (2 mo)
Rotavirus (4 mo)
DTaP (4 mo)
Hib (4 mo)
PCV (4 mo)
IPV (4 mo)
HepB (6 mo)
Rotavirus (6 mo)
DTaP (6 mo)
Hib (6 mo)
PCV (6 mo)
IPV (6 mo)
Influenza (6 mo)
Hib (12 mo)
PCV (12 mo)
MMR (12 mo)
Varicella (12 mo)
Hep A (12 mo)
DTaP (18 mo)
Influenza (18 mo)
Hep A (18 mo)
Influenza (2 yr)
Influenza (3 yr)
DTaP (4 yr)
IPV (4 yr)
MMR (4 yr)
Varicella (4 yr)
Influenza (5 yr)
Influenza (6 yr)
Influenza (7 yr)
Influenza (8 yr)
Influenza (9 yr)
Influenza (10 yr)
HPV (10 yr)
Influenza (11 yr)
HPV (11 yr)
Tdap (12 yr)
Influenza (12 yr)
Meningococcal (12 yr)
Influenza (13 yr)
Influenza (14 yr)
Influenza (15 yr)
Influenza (16 yr)
Meningococcal (16 yr)
Influenza (17 yr)
Influenza(18 yr)
The way delivery doctors and nurses immediately take a newborn child and immediately shoot them up with vaccines is ghoulish. Doctors continue to push these aggressive vaccine schedule for profit and kickbacks. The simple fact is the federal government has paid out over 3 billion to parents that have vaccine injured children. This is a fact, the government is covering up for Big Pharma and doctors absolving them of any responsibility for their destructive products they relentlessly push on naive parents. There are also whistleblowers like Dr. William Thompson that has risked it all to reveal that the CDC has created a massive coverup concerning data linking the MMR vaccines with autism.
Watch this #HearThisWell compilation video interviewing parents who have vaccine injured children.
The overuse of dirty vaccines has caused the destruction of thousands of families in America. The doctors deny the connection, the government denies the connection as does the Big Pharma companies pushing these toxins on babies and infants. Why? Money of course and lots of it.
The Pushing of Formula
Another way children's health is being destroyed by the unnatural birth prescriptions levied on children and families is the aggressive pushing of formula instead of natural breastfeeding. Lactation consultants have been turned into formula pushers in the same way that Doctors have been turned into pill pushers. Big Pharma has a product for everything and have developed covert "free care" methods to push their products on unsuspecting moms. Here is an article going over all of insidious ways doctors fudge numbers to guilt mothers into discontinuing breastfeeding in favor of formula feeding.
"There are a lot of well-intentioned expectant mothers who look forward to breastfeeding, only to be thwarted by the hospital staff when baby is seen losing too much weight. The nursing staff is taught to watch for this, and react accordingly. Far too often new mothers are being swayed from the act of breastfeeding, and persuaded into opting for baby formula, believing it will put on needed weight. However, there’s more to this initial weight loss than the assumption that mother is not supplying enough milk."(Alternet)
One of the major findings in breastfeeding studies shows that breastfeeding positively impacts the IQ of children.
"The research involved 180 babies born before 30 weeks of gestation (27 weeks, on average). The daily volume of breast milk and formula the babies consumed for their first 28 days was recorded. They were given brain MRI scans shortly after birth and again when they were 7 years old, along with a battery of standardized cognitive tests at age 7. Children fared better on those tests when breast milk had accounted for more than 50 percent of their milk/formula consumption early in life.
The more breast milk they had consumed, the higher their scores on tests of IQ, mathematics, reading, memory and motor function. MRI results showed that greater consumption of breast milk also was linked to greater volume in regions of the brain associated with memory and movement."
In short lactation nurses are damaging the brains of children with their formula racket. Not to mention the fact these children are not acquiring immunities and nutrition that only comes from breast milk. Add this to the fact that studies also show that formula feed babies double their risk of infant death in America and you realize real quick this Big Pharma formula racket is placing families and children at risk.
Nurses as CPS Tattle-tale Squads
Nurses and doctors have been turned into state led tattle-tale squads probing and reporting every minor infraction to CPS. Nothing is more destructive on families than the false reporting that is going on in hospitals all across America right now. Everything parents say or do is being jotted down, and nurses are constantly asking leading questions probing into finances and the temperament of fathers looking for excuse to turn families in to CPS. Now refusing vaccination is being treated as a CPS worthy offense by doctors.
"A doctor at an Alabama hospital allegedly told parents that they would lose custody of their newborn son if they refused to vaccinate him – and subsequently pressured them so much that they relented.
Aliea Bidwell and Ben Gray are alleging that a staff pediatrician at St. Vincent’s Hospital in Birmingham, Alabama, even threatened to have security take their 12-hour-old son and turn him over to state authorities.
The doctor reportedly made the threat after Bidwell refused to let hospital staff give her newborn, Aaron, a hepatitis B vaccine, the Inquisitr website reported. The doctor may have had no legal authority to make the request because the vaccine is not required by Alabama state law and parents have the legal right to refuse it."(OffGridNews.com)
This isn't an isolated incident, the war against parents who are skeptical about the health benefits of vaccines are at risk of losing their children. Doctors and nurses have become the medical Gestapo, destroying lives without conscious simply because parents refuse provably dangerous vaccines. CPS is getting bonuses and kickbacks for stealing children and hospitals are helping them do it.
Conclusion
Nothing is more natural than birth. Parents need to stop living and believing the fear-mongering that goes on at hospitals surrounding natural birth and take control of this God-given wonderful gift for themselves. The benefits of natural birth far outweigh the risks associated with the intervention deliveries in hospitals. Please Sign-up for our Newsletter and Like us on Facebook, for updates!
The benefits of bonding and health for your family and children are measurable as demonstrated in the article. When mankind attempts to disrupt the natural cycle of reproduction nothing good ever comes out of it.
Do your own research, do not blindly trust doctors who push expensive drugs, surgeries, and vaccines without thought simply because the Big Pharma overlords say so. They have created a mandated, fear based, government protected racket over the course of 100 years that has had a negative impact on the health and wellbeing of families. I encourage everyone to recognize that this is a demonic attempt at hijacking the reproductive cycle of humanity by social engineers and profiteers. The best thing you can do is stay out of their clutches by consulting with a midwife and having a natural birth. Home birth has been a wondrous, exciting, safe journey, for my family, and I know it will be for yours. In short take control of your own family, and never accept the recommendations of people that see you and your child as a dollar sign that gets bigger and bigger due to the interventions they foster upon unsuspecting parents all of the time.
Article Views: 7114